Showing posts with label Safe Injections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Safe Injections. Show all posts

Monday, August 12, 2013

Investigation of Adverse Events after Methylprednisolone Acetate Injections, 2013



On May 22, 2013, the North Carolina Division of Public Health (NCDPH) was notified by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of two adverse events reported to MedWatch, FDA’s Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program. Two patients had developed soft tissue abscesses after receiving methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) injections at the same clinic. The injections contained preservative-free (PF) MPA 80mg/mL from 10mL vials compounded and distributed by Main Street Family Pharmacy (MSFP) located in Newbern, Tennessee. Five similar adverse events associated with the same MPA formulation from MSFP had been identified in April among Illinois residents. Concerns about widespread use of a potentially contaminated product led to a multi-state investigation.

As of July 25, 2013, 81 facilities in 15 states administered any MPA product from MSFP to their patients; national estimates of exposed patients were unavailable. A total of 26 cases were reported from four states: Arkansas, Florida, Illinois and North Carolina. All 26 illnesses were skin or soft-tissue abscesses at the site of injection; no life-threatening infections were reported. Four case patients had positive bacterial culture or histopathologic findings including Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Aspergillus species.

In North Carolina, public health and healthcare professionals partnered to mitigate further exposure and identify any additional cases. The North Carolina Board of Pharmacy (NCBOP) identified five clinics that received MPA products from MSFP and instructed clinics to discontinue use and sequester any remaining MPA products. The NCBOP also obtained the voluntary surrender of MSFP’s license in North Carolina. NCDPH and affected county health departments worked with the five clinics to notify 1,045 patients who received MPA injections of their potential exposure and to assess for any adverse events. No further cases were identified.

There was strong evidence to support that the source of the outbreak was contaminated PF MPA compounded at MSFP. FDA product testing of recalled, unopened MPA products detected bacterial and fungal pathogens from two separate lots. Pathogens included Acinetobacter ursingii, Alternaria species, Bacillus cereus/thuringiensis/mycoides, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus pumilus, Cladosporium species, Roseomonas gilardii and Penicillium species. Detailed information can be found on the FDA website at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm355575.htm.  

As a final note, this investigation raised the following important issues. PF MPA products in 10mL vials were used for multiple doses; however, as a preservative-free product it should have been treated patient as a single-dose vial and used for one patient. Healthcare professionals should be familiar with safe injection practices including appropriate use of single-dose and multi-dose vials. For more information, visit the One and Only Campaign website at http://www.oneandonlycampaign.org/.  FDA’s MedWatch was a valuable tool for identifying this multistate outbreak where few cases were dispersed throughout the country. Healthcare providers and consumers may complete a MedWatch report (http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/default.htm) when an adverse event to a drug, product, or medical device is suspected.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Unsafe Injections in the Dental Setting



Although patient-to-patient transmission of bloodborne pathogens is well documented in a variety of healthcare settings, this type of transmission is seen infrequently in the dental setting. Since 2001, only two documented incidences of patient-to-patient hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission have occurred as a result of dental care; neither of which was attributed to unsafe injection practices.1,2
Bloodborne pathogen transmission due to infection control lapses in a medical or dental setting can be difficult to detect. Long incubation periods and asymptomatic infections associated with HBV and HCV can lead to challenges in both identifying an incident infection and in identifying a single healthcare exposure that may have led to infection. For these reasons, the number of known instances of transmission in medical, and presumably dental settings, may underrepresent the true number of infections resulting from unsafe practices.
Recent patient notifications due to infection control breaches in dental settings have not only heightened awareness of the risks associated with dental care, but have also reinforced the need for continuing education for staff performing injections in all patient care settings.
Recent Notifications. Over the last 12 months, two large-scales patient notification events have been initiated due to the identification of unsafe injection practices in dental clinics. In July 2012, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment became aware of infection control breaches at an oral surgery practice.3 Needles and syringes were reportedly used repeatedly, often for days at a time. These practices occurred for over a decade, from September 1999 through June of 2011, when the breach was discovered.  
As a result, approximately 8,000 potentially exposed patients were identified through patient records and notified that they should be tested for HBV, HCV and HIV. Additional patients with unknown addresses were reached via press release. As a result of this investigation, the oral surgeon voluntarily relinquished his license and at least five patients tested positive for a blood borne pathogen. It is important to note that the source of these infections cannot be identified and may not have been a result of unsafe practices at this office.
In late March of this year, a similar investigation and patient notification occurred. The Oklahoma State Department of Health and the Tulsa Health Department reported notification of approximately 7,000 patients of a local dental practice due to the identification of unsafe practices. They identified extensive breaches in infection control, including unsafe injection practices such as reported needle and syringe reuse for drawing up and administering medications from multidose medication vials and other mishandling of medications.
As of May 2nd, the Oklahoma State Department of Health indicated that their lab had completed testing of 3,740 persons: 69 individuals tested positive for HCV, four individuals tested positive for HBV, and fewer than three tested positive for HIV. Further investigation will be undertaken by the health departments to attempt to identify the sources of these infections.  
Resources Available for Dental Health Professionals. Safe injection practices are essential in all healthcare settings where injections are given, including dental offices. Although there have been no documented cases of patient-to-patient transmission in a dental setting due to unsafe injections, the potential exists and strict adherence to safe injection practices is critical. Like all healthcare settings, continuing education and monitoring of safe injection practices are imperative to patient safety. 
The Safe Injections Practice Coalition (SIPC), CDC and the One & Only Campaign have a variety of resources available to help promote good practices and to educate providers surrounding safe injection practices. They are listed below:

Wherever injections are given, injection safety is every provider’s responsibility!

References
1.      J Infect Dis. 2007 May 1;195(9):1311-4. Epub 2007 Mar 21. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B virus associated with oral surgery. Redd JT, Baumbach J, Kohn W, Nainan O, Khristova M, Williams I.